Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Homily Podcast



Homily 329 – Socially Unacceptable Dynamite – 30th Sunday in Ordinary Time

October 23rd, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

DynamiteFor the past six weeks, we have been reading from the letters of St. Paul to Timothy. Today we come to the end of these letters, wherein Paul gives us what is often referred to as his “last will and testament.” He knows he’s about to be executed, and he sums up his life saying, “I have competed well; I have finished the race; I have kept the faith.” What a blessing to come to the end of life with such a clean conscience. What is also so amazing is that, in spite of all the hardships Paul has had to endure, he still has great trust in God to deliver him. Yet Paul has never looked for deliverance from earthly hardship; he wants only to be delivered safely to heaven.

The lives of St. Paul and the other apostles remind us that, when the gospel is preached, it is often met with opposition. The Greek word used to describe their preaching is dynamis, “power,” the same found in the root of the word “dynamite.” When the gospel is preached, things should explode! Sadly, today it seems we expect, and maybe even hope, that nothing will happen as a result of our preaching. We like blending in and leading our lives in relative tranquility without “making waves.” We certainly hope to avoid “explosions.” This may be “safe,” but it is not what we’re called to be.

This past week, emails in the “Wikileaks” scandal revealed some of the thoughts of politically influential people about Catholics. There were many bigoted, hateful, anti-Catholic comments. Yet this is not what caught my attention. Political leaders despising Catholics is nothing new. It was certainly not unusual for St. Paul and has been the norm in much of history. What really bugged me was a comment speculating as to why so many “respectable” people are Catholic. One high level politician suggested that it’s because Catholicism is “the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion… Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelicals.”

This really bugged me because it says that, in the view of outsiders, the Catholic Church has become just a “socially acceptable” little club. You can have a little bit of your religion and still compromise enough to blend in perfectly with society. This attitude would have been very foreign to St. Paul who certainly never experienced the faith as “socially acceptable.” Yet I think the comment reflects a sad reality. We as Catholics have compromised the faith so much that indeed we do just blend in with everyone else. Look at all the Catholics who say, “I’m Catholic…BUT…I’m also pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia, pro-gay marriage, etc.” The gospel has been robbed of it’s dynamis and instead of exploding and bumping up against the culture, we have become “socially acceptable,” while settling for lives less and less acceptable to God. Again, it’s not unusual that political leaders would be anti-Catholic. What is new, and scandalous, is that now Catholics actually vote for these people.

If we look only at the national or world picture, it would be easy to get depressed. We can’t change the world overnight by ourselves, but we can change us. We can change our families. How in your own family have you compromised the dynamis of the faith so as to just go with the flow? Do you fall into the “Catholic…BUT” crowd? We change the culture one person and one family at a time. So, as St. John Paul II reminded us 38 years ago this weekend, “Do not be afraid!” Your life may end up looking more like St. Paul’s. You may wind up getting beaten, and bruised, and left for dead. Good! This means you’re doing it right. Persevere. Don’t give up. Don’t compromise the dynamis of the gospel. Then, at the end of your life, you too will be able to say like St. Paul, “I have competed well; I have finished the race; I have kept the faith.”

Options for the Undecided Voter

October 16th, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Undecided VoterThe Final (Prudential) Judgment

For almost every Presidential election I can remember, deciding who to vote for has been a fairly easy task. There have been only two realistic candidates. One candidate favors abortion and other intrinsic evils, and belongs to a party that also supports those things. The other candidate, while not perfect, at least pretends to be pro-life and belongs to a party that, at least in their platform, is also pro-life, pro-marriage, pro-family, etc. This choice has largely been a no-brainer. Even if I liked some other things about the first candidate, issues of life made it impossible for any Christian with a properly formed conscience to vote for him.

This year’s election is different. I will say in complete honesty that, with three weeks to go, I am still undecided. Based on conversations, this describes a lot of people, especially faithful Catholics. Therefore, I thought I would create this post, not to tell you who to vote for, but to explain some of the thoughts that are influencing me right now and what my decision-making process looks like. It’s easy to say what to do when things are black and white, but what about times when good Catholics can disagree and we’re left to prudential judgment? Well, here’s an example of one Catholic’s prudential judgment in action.

Clinton vs. Trump

Clinton is everything I described in the first paragraph and worse. She is, without doubt, the worst and most damaging Presidential candidate the Democrats have ever put forth. With the potential of four vacancies on the Supreme Court and her desire for activist judges, the damage of a Clinton presidency cannot be overstated.

Normally, the above would therefore mean an easy vote for the Republican nominee. However, I have often told people that the life issues have nothing to do with partisan politics. If the Republicans put up a pro-abortion candidate, I’ve always said that you would then see a bunch of Catholics prefer the Democratic party, especially if the Democrats could manage to tolerate a pro-life candidate. For the record, I have serious doubts that Trump is really pro-life. With that said, I also have to admit that it is at least possible that he really is pro-life or at least would favor laws that respect life.

In summary, we know the evil that Clinton would do, and we at least have some hope that Trump would do some good. Therefore, if the Presidential race is really only a two-person race, I think you have to vote for Trump.

A Broken 2-Party System

Given what I just said, the important question then is, “Is the Presidential race really only a two-person race when it comes to the general election?” In the past, my answer to this question has always been an emphatic “yes.” You can fight things out in the primaries to get it down to two candidates. But, when it comes to the general election, our “winner take all” system of the electoral college means that no third party candidate has a realistic chance of getting elected.

I have often told people that if the election comes down to “Hitler vs. Stalin” you can pick one. They’re both evil, but if you get a chance to minimize the evil by picking the lesser of two evils, then you can pick one. Some people will say that choosing the “lesser of two evils” is still choosing evil. This is not true. You have to consider what choice you are actually being asked to make.

If the choice is “Who do you think should be President?” without further qualification, then you should vote for someone who is your ideal candidate. However, when it comes to the general election, I believe that our choice is no longer “Who do you want to be President?” but is instead “Which of these two do you want to be President?” While it is still possible to vote for someone else, there is so little possibility of having any success, that it is a practically non-existent option. We have to play the game we are given and, like it or not, in the general election the choice we are given is, in almost every case, “Pick one or the other.”

In order to vote for someone other than the two major party candidates in the general election, there would have to be some probability of success. There would have to be some outcome that would balance out the apparent forfeiture of the chance to minimize evil.

An Unprecedented Election

Like most Americans, I cannot believe that the two candidates we have are the real candidates for President. Clinton may be the worst candidate in history, but Trump may be the second worst. It’s an embarrassment around the world that these two deeply flawed people are left running for office. Is this really the best America has to offer? Can we find no one else to run for President?

While I believe my description of the 2-party system above is accurate, I have always disliked it. It forces us to conform into being “all this” or “all that.” There’s no room for pro-life candidates in the Democratic Party, and people who favor immigrants and certain programs for the poor find little welcome in the Republican Party. If ever there were a year when I thought we could blow up the 2-party system, I thought this was it.

If everyone in America could vote for either Clinton, Trump, or None of the Above, we all know that “none of the above” would win in a landslide.

So how do we fix this? Unfortunately, I think that the answer is probably not to be found in how we vote in the general election. There were clearly flaws in the primary system that led to these candidates. On the Democratic side, we now know that Clinton had the help of the DNC in making sure that Sanders never had a chance. On the Republican side, the media built up Trump the whole primary season giving him the appearance of legitimacy. The “Trump vote” was always around 30% while the “Not Trump” vote was 70% but split among 16 other candidates. By the time the “Not Trump” vote was able to coalesce, it was too late.

So maybe this was a year of failed primaries. Still, I think it’s bigger than that. Major changes to the “winner take all” system are going to be required in order to have more diversity of candidates. It may take amending the Constitution to fix this, but we only need look at these two candidates to see how necessary change is.

So What About November?

I indicated above my feelings about voting for a third party in the general election. I have always advised against it. However, I have also said that this is an unprecedented election. In fact, this election is so unprecedented, that I am actually considering breaking my own rule. Here is what I would want my vote to do:

I absolutely do not want Clinton to be elected. Therefore, if the vote is close between Clinton and Trump, I would vote for Trump.

However, I live in Kansas. Trump appears to have more than enough votes to win. Therefore, I want to vote in such a way that the Republican Party gets the message that people are a lot more loyal to the values they think the party stands for than to the party itself. The Republican Party is not my team. If the Democrats could become pro-life and pro-family then they would become a viable option for Catholics with well-formed consciences. Both parties need to get this message.

Finally, to the extent possible, I want my vote to show my dissatisfaction with the two-party, winner take all, system. I want to blow the whole thing up. I would love to see there be no majority winner on election day and have the House elect the people’s preferred choice, “none of the above,” whoever that might be.

So, for the first time in my life, I’d have to say that I’m leaning toward voting for a third party candidate. I wouldn’t propose this to everyone. It depends on your state and if the race is closely split between Clinton and Trump. In the end, this is not about “voting for the best candidate.” That’s not the choice we’re given. This is about being as wise as serpents, playing within the rules of the game, to achieve the most favorable outcome. I don’t know exactly what that looks like in your situation, but these have been some of my thoughts. Secretly, I’m still kind of praying that “something” will happen… like the stage collapsing at the final debate or, my favorite, “Giant Meteor 2016: Just end it already.” In the event that we do end up having to vote in a few weeks, I hope the above was helpful.


Here’s an article on the mathematics of third party voting that I found helpful:

How Not To Waste Your Vote: A Mathematical Analysis

And here’s an example of how third party voting could hypothetically find success in this year’s election:

A Stupid-Simple Way Out Of Trump Vs. Hillary 2016

Homily 328 – Where We Got the Bible and What To Do With It – 29th Sunday in Ordinary Time

October 16th, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Monk WritingIn today’s second reading, St. Paul reminds St. Timothy about the importance of Sacred Scripture. As Catholics, we can fall into the tendency of focusing on Mass and the sacraments and thinking that these are the primary tools for growth in holiness. What a terrible thing it would be for us to neglect the Sacred Scripture in favor of things that seem more routine. While the Mass is obviously filled with readings from the Bible, how much time do you really spend studying those readings and praying with them?

Today’s homily is a short introduction to the Bible. One of the most important things we need to keep in mind is the context from which the Bible came. The Bible is not the complete instruction book for life. So first we consider where the Bible came from. The same authority that gave us the Bible remains the authority we need to interpret the Bible today. That authority is the Catholic Church. After we understand this, the homily moves on to talk about the important concepts of “inspiration” and “inerrancy,” and then finishes with some practical tips. Let’s heed St. Paul’s words to St. Timothy and give the reading and study of Sacred Scripture the important place in our lives it deserves.

Homily 327 – Lessons from Lepers – 28th Sunday in Ordinary Time

October 9th, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Ten LepersBoth the first reading and the gospel today involve lepers as the star characters. Today’s homily highlights three lessons that we might learn from the figures.

First, humility. It’s takes great humility for the lepers to come out of their hiding and protected places to seek healing. They know they are sick and are humble enough to get admit they need help.

Second, identity. When you read the Scripture, who do you normally identify with? It seems most people like stories of Jesus comforting people, but why does no one ever identify themselves with the Jewish leaders to whom Jesus has some pretty harsh words at times? It’s the foreigners in today’s readings who come out on top not the leaders. Be careful whom you identify with in the Scripture.

Finally, consistency. Neither Naaman nor lepers in the gospel were cured in an extravagant way, just the simple washing in the river or in the command to go to the priests. Sometimes we might want God to heal us or make us holy in some grand display of power, but normally he works slowly, through our consistent willingness to do little things. This is the “Little Way” of St. Therese and the surest path to holiness.

Humility, identity, and consistency. Three important lessons from the lepers in today’s reading.

Homily 326 – Do Something for Life – 27th Sunday in Ordinary Time

October 2nd, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Tragic PreludeThe first Sunday in October has been designated in the United States as “Respect Life Sunday.” While much progress has been made in this area since the passing of Roe v. Wade, there remain many causes for concern. At the time of the Civil War, many people fought to protect the right to own slaves using the false teaching that African Americans were not actually people. Kansas can be proud that we fought against this nonsense. The label “Free State” is now proudly etched in our history.

Sadly, in our present day, people are again trying to say that some people are not people, whether it be the baby in his or her mother’s womb, or the elderly who no longer fit the definition of what society considers “useful.” At the time of the Civil War, abolitionists like John Brown of local fame here in Osawatomie, stood up against injustice. Many people today are opposed to abortion, but it is necessary to do more than simply be personally opposed. We’ve got to be like John Brown and actually do something about it. While we may not agree with all his tactics, we have to emulate his fervor. He was willing to give his life rather than sit idly by and tolerate injustice.

Despite setbacks, we know that we can’t measure success based on worldly terms. We must be faithful and each of us do what we can. John Brown’s apparent failure at Harper’s Ferry and subsequent execution finally sparked the Civil War that ended slavery. God will use even apparent failures to bring about his plan, as is evident in an amazing story I share in today’s homily. More and more people are coming to see the injustice present today that denies so many people their human dignity. This is wonderful. Now, go out and do something about it!

Homily 325 – The Noble Confession – 26th Sunday in Ordinary Time

September 25th, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

BaptismIn today’s second reading, St. Paul writes to St. Timothy, who he has appointed Bishop of Ephesus, to give him some advice on how to be a good bishop. St. Paul urges St. Timothy,

“Lay hold of eternal life, to which you were called when you made the noble confession in the presence of many witnesses.”

This “noble confession” to which Paul refers is most likely a reference to the day of Timothy’s baptism. Today’s homily takes a look at some of the details of early Christian baptism. One thing that has remained a part of the ritual from the beginning is that there must be a “confession” of faith before the person is baptized. We refer to this today as making our “baptismal promises.” How often do you think about your own baptism and your baptismal promises? St. Paul can think of no better advice to give St. Timothy, and it’s perfect advice for us today as well. I pray that today’s homily might help you to look more deeply at your baptism and then compete well for the faith, holding fast to your own noble confession.

Homily 324 – There’s No Place Like Home – 24th Sunday in Ordinary Time

September 11th, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

DorothyOne of the great story lines of all time can be summed up by the phrase “The Journey Home.” The protagonist has somehow wound up far from home and struggles to make it back. We can can think of many great movies along this theme, but one of the classics in the genre is the famous story of Dorothy and the Wizard of Oz. A tornado has taken poor Dorothy far from Kansas and now she has to brave the Wicked Witch of the West and flying monkeys to make it back home.

Although Dorothy may be one of the more famous secular versions of “The Journey Home,” the most famous biblical version is found in today’s gospel story of “The Prodigal Son.” Far from home, he makes the difficult decision to get up and return to his father. There he finds a surprise welcome that he never expected.

The most interesting thing to me about the “Journey Home” genre is that it rarely matters how the main character got so far from home. Maybe their spaceship blew up (think Apollo 13) or there was a tornado, like in the Wizard of Oz. Even in the case of the Prodigal Son who wound up far away because of his own foolishness, that’s not really the most important part. In some sense, the “Journey Home” story doesn’t really start or get interesting until the protagonist decides to head for home. That’s when things get exciting.

So where are you at right now? Are you far from home, literally or figuratively? Maybe you’re isolated from your family, or from God. Whatever the case, it doesn’t matter how you got there. The real adventure is about to begin. All you have to do is decide that you are ready to head for home. It won’t be as easy as simply clicking your heals together, but it will be worth it. After all, as any good Kansan knows, “There’s no place like home.”

Homily 323 – The Desire to See Jesus – 23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time

September 4th, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Mother TeresaImagine someone you know is interested in learning what Christianity is really all about. What would you tell them? What’s the core message? Probably most of us could think of some attractive good thing to share. However, in today’s Gospel, we see the message Jesus shared with the crowds that were following him. “If you want to follow me, you have to be willing to sell all your possessions, hate your family, and ultimately be tortured to death…. Anyone still interested?” It’s not the most catching message for attracting followers. Many crowds followed Jesus because of the miracles he was performing. Yet, when it comes to actually being his disciples, it takes a lot more than casual interest. He likens it to building a tower. Before you even start, you better be sure you’re willing to go all the way and see it through to completion. Don’t say you want to follow Jesus unless you’re really in. You have to really want it, and it’s not going to be easy.

While it is true that being a disciple of Jesus is the path to surest happiness in this life and in the world to come, it’s not something superficial that you just get as some kind of signing bonus for beginning Christian. It takes time. You have to have two things to arrive at the true joy of Christian discipleship: First, you have to desire it. Secondly, you have to be willing to do the difficult things God asks. There is perhaps no one who did these two things better than Mother Teresa, now St. Teresa of Calcutta. She loved Jesus with a passionate desire of her whole life and was willing to do anything to see Jesus, including living her life in the slums of Calcutta. In today’s homily, I share one of my favorite Mother Teresa stories. Do you want to see Jesus? Have a listen and see how one person had that wish come true.

Homily 322 – The Secret of Giving – 22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time

August 28th, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Desert MosqueThe scene described in today’s Gospel reminds me a lot of the political atmosphere in Washington, DC: people jockeying for positions of influence, throwing parties to make allies. It can be a very self-centered culture. Jesus tell us, as Christians, that our lives cannot be like this. Rather than looking to be exalted, we should humble ourselves. Rather than always looking to get something, the joy of the Christian life is found by those who are always looking to give. Today’s homily comes on the occasion of the release of the annual financial report to the parishes and offers some concrete advice about stewardship and giving.

In the end, the thing that is most dangerous to us on our path toward heaven is our own selfishness. Anytime we put something ahead of God, we fail and are ultimately unhappy. The secret is to put God first. To put God first, we must pay God first. This is the beautiful secret to Christian happiness, a truth that I find best symbolized by, of all things, a mosque in the middle of the desert.

Homily 321 – Missionary Motivation – 21st Sunday in Ordinary Time

August 21st, 2016, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

St. Isaac JoguesIn today’s First Reading from the prophet Isaiah, we hear God’s desire to “gather the nations” and to send people out “to the nations.” In this we see, even in the Old Testament, a missionary effort to bring more people into God’s family. In Christianity, some of our most famous saints were missionaries. All endured great struggle and some even gave their lives to spread the Gospel to people who had not heard of Jesus.

Today’s homily examines three of these great Christian missionaries: St. Isaac Jogues, a French Jesuit priest who was martyred in New York in 1646 bringing the faith the the native people there; St. Junipero Serra, just canonized last year by Pope Francis and known as the “Apostle to California” for his efforts to bring the faith to the native people there in the 18th century; and finally, a saint hopefully familiar to those of us in Kansas, St. Rose Philippine Duchesne, whose most desired goal was to come to Kansas and bring the Gospel to the native peoples right here in what is now my parishes, a dream that was only fulfilled in when the saint was 71 years old.

We can indeed marvel at the great love of God that drove each of these missionaries, but there is another, even more beautiful reason motivating their lives; they believed that the salvation of souls was at stake. Today we tend to easily fall into the heresy of “indifferentism” which says that it doesn’t matter if someone is baptized or not, or is one is a “good Catholic” or a “bad Catholic.” We tend to think that just about everyone goes to heaven. Jesus tells us something much different in the Gospel today.

All the great missionaries in Church history did what they did because they knew that it would be difficult, if not impossible, for thousands of people to go to heaven if someone didn’t go teach them about Jesus and ensure they were baptized. Countless missionaries have died as martyrs because they believed it was that important to bring the good news of salvation to the whole world. How important is the faith to you? Would you be willing to sacrifice yourself so that others might receive this gift? The truth is, if you have been baptized, you are a missionary. You have a mission and Jesus is sending you. What will you do with your mission?