Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Homily Podcast

Categories

Tags

AVI Italian Pilgrimage – Day 2

June 20th, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink


Buon giorno! We arrived safely in Roma this morning and met up with our local tour guides. We then headed out for our first stop, the town of Boville. I’m fairly certain that no other tour group, perhaps ever, has gone to the town of Boville. To understand why, I’ll take this moment to explain the main reason for this particular pilgrimage.

Our pilgrimage is being led by a group of consecrated women known as the Apostles of the Interior Life (AVI in the Italian abbreviation). They were founded in Rome 25 years ago and the pilgrimage is in celebration of this anniversary. It’s also a sort of anniversary for me as well. It was twelve years ago that I first met the sisters on a pilgrimage to Italy very similar to our present itinerary. It was on that pilgrimage that I decided to enter seminary, thanks in part to the counsel of a very holy woman, Sr. Susan, who has been my spiritual director ever since. More on that story later.


Back to Boville. This was the home of a little boy named Amerigo without whom the Apostles would likely have never come to the United States. Amerigo died when he was 6 years old in Rome. At the time, an American seminarian assigned to the hospital met one of the sisters who was also caring for the family. Eventually this seminarian would become a priest in Peoria, IL and would be instrumental in getting the Apostles to found their first house at the University of Illinois. The sisters say they wouldn’t be here in America with Amerigo and consider him a sort of spiritual intercessor for their movement. That’s a pretty providential name go along with role too!

In Boville we visited the grave of Amerigo and prayed there. We then had Mass with Amerigo’s parents. The parish church was filled to capacity with a large number of the townspeople wanting to meet us and pray with us.
We were then truly blessed to be treated to a wonderful Italian dinner complete with over 6 different courses. I remember this experience well when I first arrived in Italy 12 years ago. You have to pace yourself. Every time you think the last course has arrived, there’s more. It was such an amazing lunch that we actually canceled our dinner at our hotel tonight. Speaking of which, our final destination tonight is San Giovanni Rotondo, the home of St. Pio of Pietralcina, better known as “Padre Pio.” It’s late and we’re here for two days, so more about him tomorrow. Buona note for now.

See More Day 2 Pictures

AVI Italian Pilgrimage – Day 1

June 19th, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

In history, pilgrimages have often been imposed as a penance to atone for sin. Despite all our modern conveniences, leaving home and traveling to a foreign country still requires a certain amount of asceticism. While there is much to look forward to in the days ahead, there are many little sufferings to endure in the whole process of leaving familiar surroundings to go on pilgrimage.

Just to make sure we would have something penitential to offer up right from the start, our meeting time at the airport in Kansas City was 4:30am. We had an early flight to Atlanta where we then spent the day waiting for other parts of our group to join us in time for our 6:00pm departure for Rome.
Yes, we spent 9 hours in the not so beautiful Hartsfield Jackson Airport. This did, however, give us the opportunity to celebrate Mass in the airport chapel and have an hour of adoration of the Blessed Sacrament. I also took the opportunity to watch a movie about St. Padre Pio whose home we will visit this weekend.
With penitential sleep deprivation kicking in, it’s time to cap the day with one of the unique penitential pilgrim experiences created by modern man, the transatlantic overnight airplane ride. I’ll catch you up on the other side of the pond.

Homily 293 – Memorial Day

May 25th, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Memorial DayIt’s natural to place a high value on things that cost us a lot to obtain. Often times the things of most value are the ones for which we are willing to sacrifice the most. Today we celebrate countless men and women who felt that our country was of such value that they would die for it. What is most important to you? Is there anything for which you would be willing to trade your life? Arlington cemetery is full of examples of people who found something worth dying for. Today and every day, let us be eternally grateful.

Soybeans and Meaningless Marriage

May 2nd, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

soybean seedEvery year when I go to file my taxes as a proud resident of the state of Kansas I am asked at the end of the process whether I might be eligible for any of a number of tax credits. It seems like I remember there being a credit for plugging a well or improving a swine facility. I also seem to remember something about soybeans. There was some kind of a credit for raising soybeans. Now you might wonder, “Why soybeans and not wheat?” The answer is, “I don’t know.” Maybe we have all the wheat we can handle in Kansas and what we really need are soybeans. Maybe soybeans are endangered. I don’t know the exact reason, but for some reason the state of Kansas has chosen to offer an incentive for those who grow soybeans…or plug wells.

Things may be different in your state, but there are probably some kind of tax credits for engaging in various activities. By creating tax credits for some things and not others, what the government has done is to create what we call an “incentive.” In my personal opinion, I don’t actually like the way this whole tax system works, but that’s another story. For the most part, people seem to be fine with tax credits and creating incentives to do certain things.

Now suppose that people in Kansas who improve cattle facilities get upset there is only a tax credit for improving swine facilities. What if the well diggers get jealous of the well pluggers and their tax credit? What if corn growers get so upset that they occupy the statehouse in Topeka demanding the same tax credit the soybean farmers get? In a democracy like ours they are all free to make their request known.

Now, suppose that in the name of “equality” and “fairness” the legislature agreed with the corn farmers that it wasn’t fair that the soybean farmers get a tax credit and they don’t, so they add corn growing to the soybean credit. Now the wheat farmers are in shock and demand equal treatment, so the wheat farmers get bundled in with the rest. Eventually there are alfalfa riots and milo demonstrations…and the result is that they too get added into the soybean tax credit in the name of “equality.”

What is the result of all this? What happens to the original “soybean credit?” One might argue that the soybean farmers still get their credit, so why should they care if corn and wheat and other farmers are included. What should be obvious here is that if everything is “incentivized” then nothing is. There was a reason people were choosing corn all on their own and some “incentive” was needed to choose soybeans. If the soybean credit is now open to anyone, even if they don’t grow soybeans, then while it may be true that everyone is now “equal,” it’s also true that what was once a soybean credit is now completely meaningless.

While things seem to be fairly quiet on the soybean front in Kansas, something analogous to the situation just described is raising quite a debate concerning the civil aspects of the institution of marriage. For over 5000 years cultures have found it advantageous to try to ensure that when men and women engage with each other in the act of reproduction that they do so only when they are permanently committed to each other and to the children that could result from their activity. We have traditionally used the word “marriage” to describe this stable family structure.

What we are seeing now with the debate regarding so-called “gay marriage” is something very similar to the corn farmers demanding a soybean credit in the name of equality. Notice that a soybean credit doesn’t say anything negative about corn growers; it simply says that the people of Kansas have voted that the state has a reason to incentivize soybeans. In the case of Kansas I don’t know exactly what that reason was, but in the case of marriage we do know the reason.

The state has an interest in opposite sex couples engaging in reproductive behavior because children may result from this activity. If the mother and father are not stably committed to each other, then ultimately the state could become responsible for those children.

Now obviously we rightly understand marriage to be much more than this, but as far as the state’s interest, that there is what it’s about. Note that the state has absolutely no interest in who loves whom or even in the notion of love…and that’s a very good thing! Do you really want the government deciding what constitutes love and who is sufficiently attracted to whom? It’s none of their business. What is the state’s business is making sure that children are raised by their mom and dad whenever possible.

Sadly, most of the debate surrounding gay marriage is not focused on children at all; it’s focused on the desires and “rights” of adults. Proponents of gay marriage claim that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment means that two people of the same sex should have the same “right” to marry that a man and a woman do. This is like corn farmers claiming they should have a right to a soybean credit. And you know what? I actually do think that corn farmers should have a right to the soybean credit.

I think corn farmers should have a right to a soybean credit the same way I think that gay people should have the right to marry. There’s just one requirement. If you want the soybean credit, you have to raise soybeans. You don’t get to redefine the soybean credit to include those who raise corn. Kansas doesn’t want corn; we want soybeans. If you’re gay and want to get married, you have the right to get married. There’s just one requirement. You have to choose to engage in marriage, not redefine marriage to include what you want it to be.

Maybe the corn farmers protest that they don’t want to raise soybeans. They just have no desire for soybeans. Raising corn is what makes them happy. That’s fine, but don’t expect a soybean credit. I’m not particularly attracted to well-plugging, swine, or their facilities, but I don’t go around complaining that I’m being discriminated against because I don’t get those tax credits. Maybe you think there should be a tax break for two people in a same-sex relationship. Fine. Go out and convince people. Demonstrate to all your fellow citizens why the state should incentivize people to engage in homosexual activity. If the corn growers convince enough people, then next year on my taxes there will be a corn credit right next to the soybean credit. That’s how democracy works.

Obviously all analogies limp, and here’s the most important point where the agricultural references just can’t cut it: Marriage exists apart from any civil laws whatsoever. The state does not create marriage by its laws; it can only try to regulate something that exists already on its own. If the state tells a man and a woman that they can’t get married, they can still get married. If the state tells a married couple that they are no longer married, they’re still married. And if the state tells two people of the same sex that they are married, they are still not married.

If the state, and really all of us, continue to pretend that marriage means anything that we want it to mean, then ultimately the word “marriage” will be meaningless. In some way, we are only able to have a debate about gay marriage because this has already happened in large part. It was sad to listen to the solicitor general from Michigan try to explain to the Supreme Court that marriage is supposed to be about children. He almost got laughed out of the room by the liberal justices. Similarly, the state supposedly has an interest in permanence in marriage and yet we allow no-fault divorce.

Yes, to some extent our civil notion of marriage is already meaningless. But why choose to go further down this path? To be clear, homosexuals are not responsible for the sad state of marriage today; heterosexuals are. We’ve reduced marriage down to a relationship of convenience between two consenting adults who consent only to mutually pleasure each other in sterile acts of intimacy for as long as it pleases them. If we call this marriage, it’s no wonder that gay people ask why they can’t do this too. Rather than continuing charging blindly ahead, why not instead see this as a chance to face just how far we’ve fallen. Rather than legalizing gay marriage, why don’t we outlaw no-fault divorce? Why don’t we try to back the train up from the cliff?

The real meaning of marriage exists apart from any civil definitions. No matter what the Supreme Court does, the truth about marriage will not change. Men and women willing to sacrifice their own desires for the good of their family will still get married. What’s really at stake here is whether we as a country still see the value in what marriage really means or whether we will continue to play with words and definitions to fit our own desires until our language is completely separated from truth and the word “marriage” is meaningless.

Homily 292 – Necessary for Salvation – 4th Sunday of Easter

April 26th, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

PeterIn today’s first reading, St. Peter boldly tells the Jewish leaders that there is no salvation possible except through Jesus. This is a truth that the Church has continued to teach to the present day, using the traditional formula, “Outside the Church their is no salvation.” As we honor the world day of prayer for vocations today, I am reminded of the many religious brothers and sisters who have gone to the far reaches of the earth to spread the gospel. Many have heroically laid down their lives for the truth that the Church and belief in Jesus are necessary for salvation.

At the time of the Second Vatican Council, this teaching was revisited and nuanced it slightly. Most people until that point would have took the teaching to mean that only visible members of the Catholic Church could be saved. Vatican II added that those who through no fault of their own do not know Jesus or his Church could still be saved, but only in some mysterious way through the Church. Notice that the council fathers only said that it was possible for non-Catholic to be saved. They didn’t say it would be easy or even all that likely.

I can’t imagine how difficult life would be without the sacraments, most especially the Eucharist and penance. Here again our attention is drawn to prayer for vocations. Without the priesthood we wouldn’t have the sacraments and therefore would not be the Church. We must all be incredibly grateful to our Lord that he has given us the beautiful gift of the sacraments in the Church and therefore also incredible grateful for the good shepherds through whom we continue to receive those sacraments today.

The sacraments do matter and Jesus really does want everyone to be Catholic. St. Peter faced far greater danger in professing this then any of us are likely to encounter. So what’s stopping you? Go out with great joy and share your Catholic faith in Jesus, the only means possible for salvation.

Homily 291 – What Difference Does It Make? – 2nd Sunday of Easter

April 12th, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

ResurrectionJesus is risen! In today’s gospel we see the risen Jesus enter a room where the doors were locked and bring a message of peace. We know the effect that this encounter had on the apostles. They left their quiet hiding place and fear behind and went out preaching the gospel everywhere. All of them except John would eventually lay down their lives in testimony to the truth that they had seen the risen lord. Jesus had died and was alive again, so there was nothing to fear from the world, not even death.

This freedom from the fear of death reminds me of the story of the raising of Lazarus from the dead that we heard in the days before Easter. The Scriptures tell us that so many people were coming to see Lazarus and being converted that the Jewish leaders decided that they had to put an end to this. Their incredible solution was…they would attempt to kill Lazarus. Now that just seems silly to me. Imagine how Lazarus would have felt in the the face of threats to kill him. “Well, I’ve already been dead once…so I guess go ahead and give it your best shot!”

Like Lazarus, we too have “already been dead once.” St. Paul reminds us that we have already died with Christ when we were baptized. Why is it that we still seem to live in fear? We’re afraid of such inconsequential things like the esteem of human beings or living comfortably. Why is it that so many Christians seem to keep their faith locked up in a room and are afraid to go out as the apostles did?

Today, we are the ones spoken of by Jesus to Thomas who “have not seen and yet believe.” If we truly believe in the resurrection then there is no power in this world that should give us cause for fear. The apostles met the risen lord and their lives changed forever. What about for us? Jesus is risen. He is truly risen. Now, what difference does it make?

Homily 290 – Holy Week Overview – Palm Sunday

March 29th, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Palm SundayIt always seems to me that the Palm Sunday liturgy moves so quickly. At the entrance we’re acclaiming Jesus as king and yelling Hosanna, and then just minutes later we’re on Calvary wondering what happened. The good news is that today is only meant to be the introduction to what we will now commemorate solemnly…and more slowly…over the course of this upcoming week. Today’s homily gives a brief overview of the events of this special week we call “Holy Week.” God has much grace he wishes to give us over these sacred days. I pray that you will enter fully into these special celebrations which remind us what our faith is really all about.

Homily 289 – Between Joseph and Mary – 5th Sunday of Lent

March 22nd, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Holy FamilyToday’s celebration of the 5th Sunday of Lent comes directly between two great solemnities that fall during the Lenten season. On Thursday we celebrated the Solemnity of St. Joseph, the husband of Mary. On this coming Wednesday we will celebrate the Solemnity of the Annunciation, the day Mary consented to be the Mother of God and the Word became flesh for our salvation. Although Jesus is of course God from the first moment of his conception, the Scripture tells us that in his humanity he grew in wisdom and was obedient to his parents.

Like any child, Jesus would have picked up aspects of his character from the example of his parents. In today’s homily I consider some of the key virtues of the two great examples that would have helped Jesus to grow in wisdom. As we enter into Passiontide today, I believe that we can find many ways in which Jesus found the strength for these days in the example of his earthly parents. If we also want to have the strength to take up the cross each day in our life, if we want to be more like Jesus, then we need to do as he did and place ourselves between Joseph and Mary.

Homily 288 – Listen to Him – 2nd Sunday of Lent

March 1st, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

AbrahamHopefully, before we make a big decision we listen to advice from others. Even the Code of Canon Law requires Church officials to listen before they do certain things. But who do we listen to? The Church has traditionally given us three enemies to whom we should not listen: the world the flesh and the devil. What we should do is to follow the directions of God the Father in today’s gospel and listen to Jesus. Today’s homily considers Abraham as the model for listening to God and offers advice as to how we might become more like him.

 

Homily 287 – Let’s Fight – 1st Sunday of Lent

February 22nd, 2015, by Fr. Shawn P. Tunink

Iwo Jima Flag RaisingGiven a choice between war and peace, we would naturally choose peace. Yet sometimes, to maintain peace, we have to fight. Imagine what would happen if we refused to take a worldly enemy seriously and refused to fight simply because we preferred peace. Soon we would have neither peace nor freedom. Sometimes we have to fight. The same is true in the spiritual life. We have a real enemy that is going to fight against us whether we like it or not. We cannot simply sit complacent on the sidelines.

This weekend marks the 70th anniversary of the World War II battle of Iwo Jima. This fight is perhaps best known from the famous picture taken of the marines raising the American flag on the top of Mt. Suribachi. Here in Washington the picture has been made into a large sculpture which serves as the Marine Corp War Memorial. We all love to contemplate this great scene of final victory. Yet this victory came after great struggle and as the fruit of much training and discipline. Today’s homily speaks of how we can take a lesson from the marines to help each of us fight the good fight of Lent and plant our own flag of victory at Easter.